{"id":22008,"date":"2026-07-27T16:51:37","date_gmt":"2026-07-27T16:51:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/playball.com.ng\/?p=22008"},"modified":"2026-07-27T16:51:37","modified_gmt":"2026-07-27T16:51:37","slug":"how-jose-mourinho-once-tried-to-humble-everton-as-chelsea-chased-a-21-year-old-john-stones","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/playball.com.ng\/?p=22008","title":{"rendered":"How Jose Mourinho once tried to humble Everton as Chelsea chased a 21-year-old John Stones"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"\"\/ Add as preferred source on Google<\/span> <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

Jose Mourinho. Chelsea fans love him, supporters of other Premier League clubs, not so much.<\/strong><\/p>\n

That certainly would have been the case with Everton fans back in the summer of 2015 when Chelsea were pursuing John Stones.<\/p>\n

\n

Stones is a target for Chelsea once again, but had Mourinho had his way 11 years ago, the centre-back would have already signed for the Blues by now.<\/p>\n

\n
\"Diego<\/div>
Photo by Mike Hewitt\/Getty Images<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Their pursuit of Stones, who was just 21 at the time, was a very public one. And it got really ugly at times, with Mourinho quick to remind Everton where they were as a club compared to Chelsea. <\/p>\n

Jose Mourinho labelled Everton a \u2018smaller\u2019 club<\/h2>\n

Mourinho, in effect, claimed that Everton were a \u201csmaller\u201d club than Chelsea as he explained how such outfits use the transfer market to their advantage by demanding huge fees for young English players such as Stones.<\/p>\n

Discussing Chelsea\u2019s interest in Stones and the risk of overpaying, the Special One said via Sky Sports: \u201cIt\u2019s a good market. That\u2019s why smaller clubs, if they have interesting young\u00a0English players, they use that in the right way for them.<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t criticise them. They play the market for themselves. If the big clubs\u00a0don\u2019t want to go over certain limits, they have to make a decision.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/header>\n
\n
\n
\n

Who would you rather Chelsea sign, John Stones or Maxence Lacroix?<\/h3>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n
\n
\"John<\/div>
Photo by Chris Arjoon\/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/section>\n

In the end, it was the Toffees who had the last laugh. They managed to keep hold of Stones for another season before selling him to Manchester City, while Mourinho was sacked by Chelsea before the campaign even finished.<\/p>\n

Chelsea\u2019s alternative to Stones was someone Blues supporters will never forget: Papy Djilobodji!<\/p>\n

Joking aside, Chelsea had a transfer window to forget that summer, while the 2015\/16 season was a terrible one for the club.<\/p>\n

John Stones could still be an asset to Chelsea 11 years later<\/h2>\n

It has been over a decade since Chelsea tried to sign Stones, and they are once again interested in the Englishman.<\/p>\n

Of course, Stones now has plenty of experience under his belt, which is one thing that makes signing him so appealing.<\/p>\n

Chelsea\u2019s squad lacks experience, so Xabi Alonso could do with someone like Stones.<\/p>\n

The England international is also available on a free transfer, while his ability on the ball is as good as ever. It is not 11 years too late for Chelsea, who would undoubtedly improve with the addition of Stones. <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/svg><\/p>\n
Join Our Newsletter<\/span><\/p>\n

Receive a digest of our best Chelsea content each week direct to your mailbox<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n