\n<\/p>\n
G<\/span>iven Chelsea supporters are pining for the old days, perhaps they can cheer themselves up by remembering glorious runs from some of the club\u2019s previous interim managers, although whether Calum McFarlane is capable of emulating the likes of Guus Hiddink, Roberto Di Matteo and Rafael Ben\u00edtez looks like a long shot as another damaging week for the BlueCo project draws to a close.<\/p>\n Is this inexperienced young coach the man for a salvage operation? Fans will take some convincing after watching Chelsea\u2019s players not so much throw in the towel as not even bother to pick it up at all during Tuesday\u2019s defeat to Brighton, which saw off Liam Rosenior. Those heading to Wembley for Sunday\u2019s FA Cup semi-final against Leeds will hope for a response but do not be surprised if they turn mutinous again.<\/p>\n McFarlane has inherited a mess. Chelsea have just parted ways with their second manager of the season. They have lost five league games in a row without scoring for the first time since 1912, and the fix is not a feelgood big name but someone who does not yet hold his Uefa Pro Licence. There was no call for John Terry, Chelsea\u2019s owners again minded to let the club\u2019s former captain comment from afar. Instead, they went with McFarlane, who took over as interim for two games when Enzo Maresca walked away on New Year\u2019s Day. He steps in after Rosenior paid the price for his inability to earn the trust of the dressing room.<\/p>\n The potential problem is that the 40-year-old McFarlane\u2019s profile has changed since he stepped up from the academy after Maresca\u2019s departure. McFarlane was part of Rosenior\u2019s backroom staff, so he shares culpability for the poor run. Why should it be any different? For Chelsea, part of the thinking will be that the players were so opposed to Rosenior that change was unavoidable. There is hope in McFarlane displaying the same tactical chops he showed when overseeing a deserved 1-1 draw away to Manchester City in early January. The counter is that Chelsea had Marc Cucurella sent off and lost 2-1 to Fulham under his watch three days later.<\/p>\n McFarlane is liked by the players but his experience within senior football is minimal. He started coaching after giving up on becoming a player. He worked at grassroots level, coaching at Kinetic Academy, a football and education charity based in London. McFarlane progressed to Manchester City\u2019s and Southampton\u2019s academies. There is a connection with Joe Shields, Chelsea\u2019s director of recruitment and talent. McFarlane joined Chelsea last year, taking over as their under-21s manager; it would be quite the story if he can guide them to the final. He has never managed at Wembley.<\/p>\n Yet Chelsea fans are not feeling the romance. McFarlane does not represent a break with the immediate past. He was in the away dugout at the Amex Stadium, watching as Brighton ran rings around a demotivated Chelsea. Rosenior ripped into his players in his final press conference, hammering their lack of application. McFarlane played the straightest of bats when he met the media on Friday, though. He refused to get into whether the players had stopped trying for Rosenior, and he has not held a clear-the-air meeting with them.<\/p>\n McFarlane refused to elaborate on what had gone wrong for his old boss. \u201cIt\u2019s not my place to say,\u201d he said. \u201cWhat\u2019s gone on in the past doesn\u2019t need to be spoken about\u201d. It does, though. A \u00a31bn team has just buried a manager and slid away from the Champions League spots. The lack of leadership and character has been exposed. Some senior players have been a disgrace. Younger players have floundered.<\/p>\n